Projekte im Inland


 o Home
 o Organization
 o Research in Noricum &
   Pannonia
   o Asturis-Zwentendorf
   o Bruckneudorf
   o Burgstall
   o Carnuntum
   o Colatio-Stari Trg
   o Favianis-Mautern
   o Frauenberg
   o Magdalensberg
   o Saaz
   o History of Science
 o Research in the
   Mediterranean Region
 o Publications
 o External Relations


PROVINCIAL ROMAN ARCHAEOLOGY IN AUSTRIA 1918-1945
Institutions - Individuals - Excavation Sites - Research Focus

In August 2008, work began at the ÖAI on a project supported by the FWF designed to study the nature of Provincial Roman Archaeology in Austria during the first half of the 20th century (Project number P20877-G02). It is the goal of the project to analyse the nature of archaeological research by means of the leading individuals and institutions, the excavation sites and focal points of research, in their political and ideological context, and to present the results in a comprehensive documentation. Connections between scientific research and politics, and their consequences, should be made clear. In the treatment of these themes, which in Classical and Provincial Roman Archaeology remains a desideratum in the field of the history of science, attention should be paid to the specifically Austrian situation with regard to the history of research, which differs from that of Germany: in Austria, Provincial Roman Archaeology was always part of Classical Archaeology.
The chronological period under investigation in the project spans the time from the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy, through the First Republic, the 'Ständestaat' (authoritarian state), and the period of National Socialism, up until the creation of the Second Republic in 1945.
Sources which will be consulted include the contemporary literature as well as archival material; therefore, research in a variety of archives will constitute an essential component of the project. An important matrix is formed by the collection of documents in the archive of the ÖAI.
Institutions which were active archaeologically and which should be examined include not only universities and other scientific institutions, but also the activities of museums and societies should be taken into account. Archaeological research was decided upon not only by scientists active at universities and research institutions beyond the university, but also by amateur researchers.

In addition to the documentation of the four basic areas, which will be composed in the form of a catalogue, detailed analysis of specific themes is also planned. The work will be oriented towards the following series of questions, amongst others:

  • Which crucial points in terms of content and geography were established in research, and to what extent did the period of radical change of 1918, the ideology of the 'Ständestaat', and the racial theories of the Nazi era influence this research? Which projects were initiated and/or transformed - and how are these to be interpreted in the context of their time?
  • Excavations with political intentions were, for example, the 'Führergrabung' Carnuntum and the investigation of the Karnburg in Carinithia in 1939. Is it possible to identify, at other excavations of the 'twenties, 'thirties, and 'forties, the influence of the current ideology in the choice of focal points or in the interpretation of the finds?
  • Were Celts, Romans or Germans provided with particular connotations?
  • How is the role of the acting individuals to be viewed? To what extent did their proximity to or distance from the ruling power structure influence their research? How far did those scientifically responsible attempt to conform to the times, or allow themselves to be instrumentalised, and was there, on the part of scientific knowledge, an attempt to utilise politics for their own ends (as 'resources for each other')?
  • What degree did the exclusion of 'non-aryan' scientists assume, and what effect did this have on scientific knowledge?
  • What influence did the rival institutions of the SS, the "Amt Rosenberg" and the "Ahnenerbe", active during the Third Reich in the area of cultural politics, have on archaeological research in Austria?

Picture Captions
Fig. 1: Sopron/Ödenburg 1935. Hedwig Kenner (sitting, in the front of the picture), Juliane Spitzer, Anton Raubitschek and Hans Deringer, studying the fragments of the Capitoline Trias directed by Camillo Praschniker (© OEAI; archive, estate Praschniker)
Fig. 2: Rudolf Egger and Gerhard Bersu on the Duel hill. Charcoal drawing owned by Egger's granddaughter Mag. Ute Walter (courtesy U. Walter; artist: MK; photographer: H. Böhm). Excavations on the Duel were carried out from 1928 to 1931 in cooperation between the Austrian Archaeological Institute (OEAI) and the Roman-Germanic Commission (RGK).

Bibliography (Selection):
V. Losemann, Nationalsozialismus und Antike. Studien zur Entwicklung des Faches Alte Geschichte 1933-1945, Historische Perspektiven 7 (Hamburg 1977).
M. A. Niegl, Die archäologische Erforschung der Römerzeit in Österreich. Eine wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Untersuchung, DenkschrWien 141 (Wien 1980).
E. Rudolf, Pompeji vor den Toren Wiens. Die "Führergrabung" von Carnuntum 1938/40, Hephaistos 13, 1995, 203-220.
O. H. Urban, "Er war der Mann zwischen den Fronten". Oswald Menghin und das Urgeschichtliche Institut der Universität Wien während der Nazizeit, ArchA 80, 1996 (1997) 1-24.
B. Näf (ed., with the collaboration of T. Kammusch), Antike und Altertumswissenschaft in der Zeit von Faschismus und Nationalsozialismus, Kolloquium Zürich 14.-16. Oktober 1998 (Mandelbachtal - Cambridge 2001).
A. Leube (ed., in co-operation with M. Hegewisch), Prähistorie und Nationalsozialismus. Die mittel- und osteuropäische Frühgeschichtsforschung in den Jahren 1933-1945, Studien zur Wissenschafts- und Universitätsgeschichte 2 (Heidelberg 2002).
M. Maischberger, German archaeology during the Third Reich, 1933-45: a case study based on archival evidence, Antiquity 76, 2002, 209-218.
U. Halle, "Die Externsteine sind bis auf weiteres germanisch!" Prähistorische Archäologie im Dritten Reich, Sonderveröffentlichungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen und Historischen Vereins für das Land Lippe 68 (Bielefeld 2002).
R. Bollmus, Das Amt Rosenberg und seine Gegner. Studien zum Machtkampf im nationalsozialistischen Herrschaftssystem, Studien zur Zeitgeschichte 1 (Stuttgart 1970; 2nd edition München 2006).
M. Ash, Wissenschaft und Politik als Ressourcen für einander, in: R. vom Bruch - B. Kaderas (eds.), Wissenschaften und Wissenschaftspolitik. Bestandsaufnahmen zu Formationen, Brüchen und Kontinuitäten im Deutschland des 20. Jahrhunderts (Stuttgart 2002) 32-51.
M. H. Kater, Das "Ahnenerbe" der SS 1935-1945. Ein Beitrag zur Kulturpolitik des Dritten Reiches, Studien zur Zeitgeschichte 6 (Stuttgart 1974; 4th edition München 2006).
R. Jernej, Archäologie in Kärnten 1938-1945, in: J.-P. Legendre - L. Olivier - B. Schnitzler (Eds.), L'archéologie nazie en Europe de l'Ouest / Nazi-Archäologie in Westeuropa, EAA Kongress Lyon 2004 (Gollion 2007) 271-285.
St. Altekamp, Klassische Archäologie und Nationalsozialismus, in: J. Elvert - J. Nielsen-Sikora (Eds.), Kulturwissenschaften und Archäologie (Stuttgart; publication date not clear); Complete text online: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/oa/bookchapters/reD5IMz1lbPVM/PDF/291OSMHgfjGYo.pdf.

Contact:
Gudrun Wlach


December 2008